Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms
От | Pierre Ducroquet |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5128104.C1GyuidneG@peanuts2 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms (Yuriy Zhuravlev <stalkerg@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday, May 28, 2018 4:37:06 AM CEST Yuriy Zhuravlev wrote: > > Can't see getting rid of those entirely. None of the github style > > platforms copes with reasonable complex discussions. > > I disagree. A good example of complex discussions on github is Rust > language tracker for RFCs: > https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues > and one concrete example: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/2327 > I have no any problem with complex discussions on github. It is indeed hard to follow on github, and would be even worse with bigger threads. Email readers show threads in a hierarchical way, we can see who answered to who, discussions can fork to completely different aspects of an issue without being mixed together. > Anyway, it's much better than tons of emails in your mailbox without tags > and status of discussion. A github thread does not show what I read / what I have to read, does it now ?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: