Re: Fractal tree indexing
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Fractal tree indexing |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 511BD3EA.5040904@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Fractal tree indexing (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/13/2013 09:54 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: >> I'd call it out as a marketing name. I guess it's fractal in the sense that >> all levels of the tree can hold "leaf tuples" in the buffers; the structure >> looks the same no matter how deep you zoom, like a fractal.. But "Buffered" >> would be more appropriate IMO. > > I hope for their sake there is more to it than that. It's hard to see > how buffering can be patented. Talk to Apple about that. It only needs to be worded correctly. JD > -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC @cmdpromptinc - 509-416-6579
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: