Re: DROP OWNED BY fails to drop privileges granted by non-owners (was Re: [GENERAL] Bug, Feature, or what else?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Adrian Klaver
Тема Re: DROP OWNED BY fails to drop privileges granted by non-owners (was Re: [GENERAL] Bug, Feature, or what else?)
Дата
Msg-id 5115404E.7080403@gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: DROP OWNED BY fails to drop privileges granted by non-owners (was Re: [GENERAL] Bug, Feature, or what else?)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 02/08/2013 10:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com> writes:
>> I am not sure I am following. Are we talking two different cases here?
>
> What I was pointing out was that the non-superuser case seems to be
> broken almost completely, whereas the superuser case is only broken
> if the object owner has given away some grant options and those have
> been exercised.

Got it, thanks.

>
>             regards, tom lane
>


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@gmail.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: DROP OWNED BY fails to drop privileges granted by non-owners (was Re: [GENERAL] Bug, Feature, or what else?)
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Time for an autoconf update