Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_ctl idempotent option |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5108407A.3020408@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_ctl idempotent option (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/28/13 9:29 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > pg_upgrade uses that to find out of the server was already running or if > we started it. This is to start the server to remove the > postmaster.pid file. It's currently a bit missed up anyway. pg_ctl start is successful if the server is already started, but pg_ctl -w start fails. What pg_upgrade is doing doesn't sound particularly safe, for example when something is concurrently starting or stopping the server. > Also, no one has explained how not knowing if -o > options were used was a safe. Hmm, good point. But we already have this problem -- see above.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: