On 23.01.2013 20:56, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 06:03:28PM +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> anyway, +1 for making this as default option. Going that path, would
>> we be breaking backward compatibility? There might be scripts, (being
>> already used), which depend upon the current behaviour.
>
> FYI, I have a pg_upgrade patch that relies on the old throw-an-error
> behavior. Will there be a way to still throw an error if we make
> idempotent the default?
Could you check the status with "pg_ctl status" first, and throw an
error if it's not what you expected?
- Heikki