Re: Contrib PROGRAM problem
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Contrib PROGRAM problem |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 50FA27CB.9090005@dunslane.net обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Contrib PROGRAM problem (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/18/2013 11:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> This patch seems to do the right thing. > Hmm ... seems kinda grotty ... isn't there a cleaner way? > >> It probably needs to be applied to all the live branches. > Agreed on back-patching once we have the right thing, but I don't like > this version too much. > > I'm happy of you can find something cleaner. We can't just have a dependency of all on $(PROGRAM)($X) because if PROGRAM is empty but X is not it will do something horrid like try to build ".exe". If we do it the way Zoltan suggested then on Windows even if $(PROGRAM)$(X) exists and is up to date it could be rebuilt, since the target name won't exist. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: