<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/17/2013 04:43 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:<br /></div><blockquote
cite="mid:CABUevEz1PZVgMd-crbHKjngK+p4NYNVFVs8Gg-5EtNkNv9JnTg@mail.gmail.com"type="cite"><p dir="ltr"><br /> On Jan 17,
20138:15 AM, "Abhijit Menon-Sen" <<a href="mailto:ams@2ndquadrant.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">ams@2ndquadrant.com</a>>wrote:<br /> ><br /> > At 2013-01-17 16:05:05 +0900, <a
href="mailto:michael.paquier@gmail.com"moz-do-not-send="true">michael.paquier@gmail.com</a> wrote:<br /> > ><br
/>> > Is it really necessary to create a new commit fest just to move the<br /> > > items? Marking the
patchesthat are considered as being too late for<br /> > > 9.3 should be just returned with feedback.<br />
><br/> > Opening 2013-03 is not so much to move existing patches, but to give<br /> > people a place to submit
*new*post-9.3 patches without interrupting<br /> > the 2013-01 CF.<p dir="ltr">Yeah, and +1 for doing that. The
soonerthe better. By whichever of the time frames for the cf that had been discussed, it should certainly not be open
foraccepting new patches for 9.3 anymore.<br /></blockquote> I've moved all pending patches from 2012-11 to 2013-01.
I'llgo through and poke them for aliveness and start chasing things up; in the mean time, any chance of closing
2012-11?<br/><pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- Craig Ringer <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/">http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/</a>PostgreSQLDevelopment, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services</pre>