Re: CF3+4
| От | Craig Ringer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: CF3+4 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 50F7F9D3.4000501@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: CF3+4 (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: CF3+4
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I've moved all pending patches from 2012-11 to 2013-01. I'll go through and poke them for aliveness and start chasing things up; in the mean time, any chance of closing 2012-11?
On Jan 17, 2013 8:15 AM, "Abhijit Menon-Sen" <ams@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> At 2013-01-17 16:05:05 +0900, michael.paquier@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > Is it really necessary to create a new commit fest just to move the
> > items? Marking the patches that are considered as being too late for
> > 9.3 should be just returned with feedback.
>
> Opening 2013-03 is not so much to move existing patches, but to give
> people a place to submit *new* post-9.3 patches without interrupting
> the 2013-01 CF.Yeah, and +1 for doing that. The sooner the better. By whichever of the time frames for the cf that had been discussed, it should certainly not be open for accepting new patches for 9.3 anymore.
-- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: