Jonathan,
> The second has to do with the language on the bottom of the page discussing the
> sponsorship levels and selection process. I reworded the sentences to more
> clearly state the purpose of the sponsorship levels are and how they are
> selected, maintaing a link to the guidelines on the wiki.
Thank you for taking this on!
Unfortunately, I think that your new wording is just as muddy as the
previous wording. Can we use this instead?
"Sponsorship levels are based on both duration and volume of code and
non-code contributions to the project. The list of project sponsors
every one to two years by the Sponsorship Committee<link>. If you find
missing sponsors or inaccurate information on the sponsors list, please
contact <mailto>"
... this will also require us to have a mailto address for people to
contact.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com