Re: [BUGS] BUG #7766: Running a DML statement that affects more than 4 billion rows results in an exception
| От | Stefan Reiser |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #7766: Running a DML statement that affects more than 4 billion rows results in an exception |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 50F04D82.7020202@tu-braunschweig.de обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #7766: Running a DML statement that affects more than 4 billion rows results in an exception (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] BUG #7766: Running a DML statement that affects
more than 4 billion rows results in an exception
|
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Kris Jurka schrieb:
>
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>> Ok, I've pushed this fix into master
>>
> You've made any failure to parse the affected row count return
> SUCCESS_NO_INFO. Shouldn't you change the integer parsing to a long
> parsing and only modify the response if the value is > INT_MAX while still
> throwing an exception if we get something that is truly undecipherable?
>
> Kris Jurka
>
>
Dave,
I'm completely unfamiliar with the driver's code, so I better won't take
part in the further discussion -- just one thing: Now "insert_oid" won't
be assigned correctly when the assignment of update_count fails:
[QueryExecutorImpl.java]
try
{
update_count = Integer.parseInt(status.substring(1 +
status.lastIndexOf(' ')));
if (status.startsWith("INSERT"))
insert_oid = Long.parseLong(status.substring(1 +
status.indexOf(' '),
status.lastIndexOf(' ')));
}
catch (NumberFormatException nfe)
{
update_count=Statement.SUCCESS_NO_INFO;
}
better be something like this: ?
try
{
update_count = Integer.parseInt(status.substring(1 +
status.lastIndexOf(' ')));
}
catch (NumberFormatException nfe)
{
update_count=Statement.SUCCESS_NO_INFO;
}
try {
if (status.startsWith("INSERT"))
insert_oid = Long.parseLong(status.substring(1 +
status.indexOf(' '),
status.lastIndexOf(' ')));
} catch ( ...
// don't know what expected behaviour should be ...
}
regards
Stefan Reiser
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: