Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 50EEFC43.9080003@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/10/2013 12:35 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> I think there's a very good case for breaking the nexus between >> PRETTYFLAG_PAREN and PRETTYFLAG_INDENT+line wrapping for views. Only >> PRETTYFLAG_PAREN affects the safety issue. The others are just about >> white space in safe places. > What I was actually thinking about was turning on indent/linewrapping > all the time (ie, no change on pg_dump's side, just hack ruleutils). > If we believe it's safe, why not just do it? It's the paren-removal > that pg_dump can't tolerate. > > Works for me. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: