On 12/21/12 5:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail@joh.to> writes:
>> Another idea would be to force the STRICT to be immediately after
>> INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE.
>
> What about before it, ie
>
> STRICT UPDATE ...
>
> This should dodge the problem of possible conflict with table names,
> and it seems to me to read more naturally too.
Yeah, putting STRICT after the command wouldn't work for UPDATE.
I like this one best so far, so I'm going with this syntax for the next
version of the patch.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja