On 12/05/2012 04:19 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
> Is 3.2 a significant regression from previous releases, or is 3.4 just
> faster? Your wording only indicates that "older kernel is slow," but
> your tone would suggest that you feel this is a regression, cf.
It's definitely a regression. I'm trying to pin it down, but the
3.2.0-24 kernel didn't do the CPU drain down to single-digits on that
client load test. I'm working on 3.2.0-30 and going down to figure out
which patch might have done it.
Older kernels performed better. And by older, I mean 2.6. Still not 3.4
levels, but that's expected. I haven't checked 3.0, but other threads
I've read suggest it had less problems. Sorry if I wasn't clear.
--
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 500 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-444-8534
sthomas@optionshouse.com
______________________________________________
See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email