Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Markus Wanner
Тема Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker
Дата
Msg-id 50BCCBCF.9030304@bluegap.ch
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 12/03/2012 04:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Is there anything to be gained *now* from merging those two concepts?
>> I saw that as refactoring that can occur once we are happy it should
>> take place, but isn't necessary.
> 
> IMO it's a net loss in robustness of the autovac implementation.

Agreed.

That's only one aspect of it, though. From the other point of view, it
would be a proof of stability for the bgworker implementation if
autovacuum worked on top of it.

Regards

Markus Wanner



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Markus Wanner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker
Следующее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [v9.3] Row-Level Security