Re: ALTER TABLE ... NOREWRITE option
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ALTER TABLE ... NOREWRITE option |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 50BA6799.7070908@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: ALTER TABLE ... NOREWRITE option (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: ALTER TABLE ... NOREWRITE option
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
>> I'm not thrilled about inventing YA keyword for this. If you have a
>> problem with that sort of scenario, why aren't you testing your DDL
>> on a test server before you do it on production?
*I* do test my DDL. However, there are literally hundreds of thousands
of Rails, Django and Hibernate developers who "test" their DDL by
running it using a 5-row dataset on their laptops before pushing it to
production. As far as these folks are concerned, "rewrite if there's a
default" is a completely unintuitive booby-trap.
I agree that adding "NOREWRITE" is a bad solution, though. Personally,
I'd rather have a system function which tests whether a series of DDL
statements involves a rewrite anywhere. e.g.:
SELECT pg_test_for_rewrite('ALTER TABLE josh ADD COLUMN haircolor')
Hmmmm. Actually, that wouldn't work with migrations tools, especially
Rails. Better, what about a GUC?
SET message_on_rewrite=WARNING;
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: