Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Markus Wanner
Тема Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker
Дата
Msg-id 50B8B336.1010807@bluegap.ch
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
Ответы Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 11/30/2012 01:40 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> I totally missed the need to connect to shared memory to be able to
> connect to a database and query it. Can't we just link the bgworkder
> code to the client libpq library, just as plproxy is doing I believe?

Well, sure you can use libpq. But so can external processes. So that's
no benefit of running under the postmaster.

Regards

Markus Wanner

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kohei KaiGai
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: missing LockBuffer(buffer, BUFFER_LOCK_SHARE) in trigger.c GetTupleForTrigger?