Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2

On 28.11.2012 15:47, Andres Freund wrote:
> I mean the label read by read_backup_label(). Jeff's mail indicated it
> had CHECKPOINT_LOCATION at 1/188D8120 but redo started at 1/CD89E48.

That's correct. The checkpoint was at 1/188D8120, but it's redo pointer
was earlier, at 1/CD89E48, so that's where redo had to start.

- Heikki