Re: Poor performance using CTE
| От | Craig Ringer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Poor performance using CTE |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 50AD750B.8010108@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Poor performance using CTE (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On 11/22/2012 08:38 AM, Gavin Flower wrote: > I suspect most people are blissfully unaware of CTE's being fenced, or > at least not really sure what it means. So I suspect NOT FENCE would > be the better default. It's also probably more standard, and a better fit with what other DBs do. Pg would still need to detect conditions like the use of functions with side effects or (obviously) INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE wCTEs and not push conditions down into them / pull conditions up from them, etc. That's how I read the standard, though; must have the same effect as if the queries were executed as written, so Pg is free to transform them so long as it doesn't change the results. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: