Re: Possible bug / regression from generated keys
От | dmp |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Possible bug / regression from generated keys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 509A931A.7010906@ttc-cmc.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Possible bug / regression from generated keys (Peter Cooner <petriborg@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
I don't think a mountain of data is required for this one. The ByteConverter class does not exist for the 9.1-902 so was introduced later and is in 9.2-100X. Since git holds no history I can not determine introduction, but a search of this mailing list would perhaps lead to the reason for the change. What I can say is it looks like the column is binary. I could compile the source for 9.2-1001 with output that may tell you perhaps more information. I suspect though someone here is more familiar with the change to understand the problem. I would say this behavior is undesirable and could be classified as a bug. danap. Peter Cooner wrote: > Summary: > I'm getting an exception from the ResultSet returned from > getGeneratedKey() from a batch insert PreparedStatement. When I use > any of the postgresql-9.2-100X.jdbc4.jar drivers I get exceptions, but > when I use postgresql-9.1-902.jdbc4.jar it works. > > Has anyone seen anything like this? How can I debug this problem > further? How should I go about determining if this is a bug? > > Exception: > java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 4 > at org.postgresql.util.ByteConverter.int8(ByteConverter.java:29) > at org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2ResultSet.getLong(AbstractJdbc2ResultSet.java:2150) > at org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2ResultSet.internalGetObject(AbstractJdbc2ResultSet.java:142) > at org.postgresql.jdbc3.AbstractJdbc3ResultSet.internalGetObject(AbstractJdbc3ResultSet.java:36) > at org.postgresql.jdbc4.AbstractJdbc4ResultSet.internalGetObject(AbstractJdbc4ResultSet.java:296) > at org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2ResultSet.getObject(AbstractJdbc2ResultSet.java:2703) > ... > > Usually followed later by this exception: > org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: Bad value for type long : , > at org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2ResultSet.toLong(AbstractJdbc2ResultSet.java:2971) > at org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2ResultSet.getLong(AbstractJdbc2ResultSet.java:2163) > at org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2ResultSet.internalGetObject(AbstractJdbc2ResultSet.java:142) > at org.postgresql.jdbc3.AbstractJdbc3ResultSet.internalGetObject(AbstractJdbc3ResultSet.java:36) > at org.postgresql.jdbc4.AbstractJdbc4ResultSet.internalGetObject(AbstractJdbc4ResultSet.java:296) > at org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2ResultSet.getObject(AbstractJdbc2ResultSet.java:2703) > ... > > Setup: > OS: Ubuntu 10.04 > PG: 9.2 > JDBC: postgresql-9.2-1001.jdbc4.jar > > I'm also using PostGIS 2.0.1 jar, Apache Commons DBUtils, and DBCP. > > I *believe* that it must have something to do with concurrent database > connections or connection reuse, but I haven't been successful at > creating a test case, despite trying for several days now. > > Suggestions? I've got a mountain of data - if anyone needs more details.
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: