Re: BUG #7598: Loss of view performance after dump/restore of the view definition

I was doing the test on the released 9.2.1 (without the patch).
The times of the query with the original view were floating around those
values, so it's maybe just a luck that it was slightly slower on 9.2.1.

The big difference was after the view was restored with the explicit
cast. The purpose of this updated test case was mainly that you can
check which change between 9.1.4 and 9.2.1 could have caused this
performance regression and if this change can have some negative impact
(on different queries) even after applying the patch.

Thanks for the patch anyway.

Regards,
Vaclav Juza

On 15/10/2012 17:44, Tom Lane wrote:
> Vaclav Juza <vaclav.juza@xitee.com> writes:
>> I have modified the test case (it is more similar to the real-word
>> query), so that now it is slower on 9.2.1 than on 9.1.4 (the version
>> with the explicit cast):
>
> FWIW, testing this on HEAD (with the patch I committed last week),
> I get a plan that's about 10% faster than 9.1; or if I disable
> index-only scans for a more level playing field, it's just about
> equivalent to 9.1.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>