Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5078.1011815834@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects (Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org> writes:
> One of the things schemas have to support is essentially a PATH specifier.
Yes, but...
> So all we need to do is have all of the schemas created in a new DB have
> path specifiers pulling in all of the other schemas. Thus we can make a
> schema-savy system act as if it has only one namespace.
When you create a new user, do all those path specifiers for the
existing users magically update themselves? Seems like maintenance
would be a pain.
Fernando's "any" idea is probably a cleaner way to handle it if we
wanted to do things like that. But I still think it'll be safer and
more controllable if we provide a "public" namespace instead; see
followup discussions.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: