Re: hardware advice
| От | M. D. |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: hardware advice |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5065DF86.2030909@turnkey.bz обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: hardware advice (David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: hardware advice
Re: hardware advice |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On 09/28/2012 09:57 AM, David Boreham wrote: > On 9/28/2012 9:46 AM, Craig James wrote: >> Your best warranty would be to have the confidence to do your own >> repairs, and to have the parts on hand. I'd seriously consider >> putting your own system together. Maybe go to a few sites with >> pre-configured machines and see what parts they use. Order those, >> screw the thing together yourself, and put a spare of each critical >> part on your shelf. >> > This is what I did for years, but after taking my old parts collection > to the landfill a few times, realized I may as well just buy N+1 > machines and keep zero spares on the shelf. That way I get a spare > machine available for use immediately, and I know the parts are > working (parts on the shelf may be defective). If something breaks, I > use the spare machine until the replacement parts arrive. > > Note in addition that a warranty can be extremely useful in certain > organizations as a vehicle of blame avoidance (this may be its primary > purpose in fact). If I buy a bunch of machines that turn out to have > buggy NICs, well that's my fault and I can kick myself since I own the > company, stay up late into the night reading kernel code, and buy new > NICs. If I have an evil Dilbertian boss, then well...I'd be seriously > thinking about buying Dell boxes in order to blame Dell rather than > myself, and be able to say "everything is warrantied" if badness goes > down. Just saying... > I'm kinda in the latter shoes. Dell is the only thing that is trusted in my organisation. If I would build my own, I would be fully blamed for anything going wrong in the next 3 years. Thanks everyone for your input. Now my final choice will be if my budget allows for the latest and fastest, else I'm going for the x5690. I don't have hundreds of users, so I think the x5690 should do a pretty good job handling the load.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: