Hi,
No one needs to know anything about your product or what you intend to do with it. All you need to know is that if you choose to use other software components in your product, open source or closed source, you must adhere to the license they are released under.
http://initd.org/psycopg/license/ It appears to be a mystery that what you intend to do with psycopg2 is not compatible with this license and I can't see why.
All the best.
Julian
On 15/09/12 03:55, Vishnu VV wrote:
Hi Danielle,
The concern is with LGPL v3 in a closed appliance in the consumer space; and that we would have to allow others to patch the product with an updated version of the library. We have no issue releasing any improvements made to the driver back to the community, the concern is if we would end up exposing other commercial code that would be required to patch the driver in our product.
We have no problem with LGPL v2 or a commercial license that required us to release back changes we make to the driver itself. Is that a possibility?
If we can call you or your team regarding a commercial license, that should help us use psycopg and postgresql.
Thanks,
Vishnu
5123786441
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Daniele Varrazzo
<daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Vishnu VV <
movievishnu@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any commercial license that is sold for psycopg driver. LGPL V3
> seems very restrictive.
order to just use psycopg2. If you instead improve the driver we want
your improvements back. Is that restrictive?
-- Daniele