Re: Shouldn't psql -1 imply ON_ERROR_STOP?

Am 25.07.2009 um 15:00 schrieb Peter Eisentraut:

> When you run a file with psql -1/--single-transaction, and a command  
> fails,
> you get bombarded with
>
> ERROR:  current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of
> transaction block
>
> for the rest of the file.
>
> Shouldn't -1 imply ON_ERROR_STOP or some variant by default?

Sounds reasonable, +1 from me.

Regards
Michael Paesold