Re: Bug in libpq implentation and omission in documentation?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Heikki Linnakangas
Тема Re: Bug in libpq implentation and omission in documentation?
Дата
Msg-id 502904E9.5010503@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Bug in libpq implentation and omission in documentation?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 08.08.2012 17:35, Tom Lane wrote:
> A runtime check for too many parameters seems appropriate.  Assuming
> that the error message it throws is well written, I don't think we need
> to adjust the documentation.  There are many limitations that are not
> spelled out in the docs, and adding every one of them would not amount
> to a net improvement.  Considering that Jim is the first to try this in
> however many years it's been since 7.4, I don't think that everybody
> needs to read about this restriction while they're trying to absorb what
> PQexecParams does.

Runtime check added to the functions that take an nParams argument.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: sharing variables between client and server again