Re: PATCH: Implement value_to_json for single-datum conversion
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PATCH: Implement value_to_json for single-datum conversion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50289BD2.1050607@ringerc.id.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PATCH: Implement value_to_json for single-datum conversion (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/13/2012 01:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Actually, given the above, what did you need value_to_json(text) for at > all? Wouldn't value_to_json(anyelement) have covered it? Usability. Without the version accepting text an explicit cast to text is required to disambiguate a literal argument like value_to_json('something') . > But yeah, the general approach to suppressing complaints from that > opr_sanity test is to make more C entry points. The point of it, > in some sense, is that if you want to make an assumption that two > types are binary-equivalent then it's better to have that assumption > in C code than embedded in the pg_proc entries. The cases that we > let pass via the "expected" outputs are only ones where binary > equivalence seems pretty well assured, like text vs varchar. Thanks. I appreciate the explanation, and sorry for the newbie error. On the JSON stuff, I can see it's not as simple as adding a simple escape function. For my needs during the 9.2 timeframe I'll bundle up an extension with the functionality I need and deal with the need to port to whatever 9.3 includes. Hopefully a "json_value" or "javascript_value" or similar can be introduced for 9.3, given comments like: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-05/msg00030.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-05/msg00065.php .. expressing not only the need for json scalars, but the fact that they're already commonplace in pretty much everything else. Given this: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-05/msg00040.php it does seem that `json' should be a whole document not a fragment, but IMO a way to work with individual JSON values is going to be *necessary* to get the most out of the json support - and to stop people who use JSON in the real world complaining that Pg's JSON support is broken because it follows the standard not real-world practice. Personally the lack of json scalars has prevented me from using JSON support in two different places already, though it's proving very useful in many others. -- Craig Ringer
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: