Postgres Professional
en

Re: ZFS vs. UFS

От: Georgi Naplatanov
Тема: Re: ZFS vs. UFS
Дата: ,
Msg-id: 500E9D31.6050107@oles.biz
(см: обсуждение, исходный текст)
Ответ на: ZFS vs. UFS  (Laszlo Nagy)
Список: pgsql-performance

Скрыть дерево обсуждения

ZFS vs. UFS  (Laszlo Nagy, )
 Re: ZFS vs. UFS  (Georgi Naplatanov, )
 Re: ZFS vs. UFS  (Ivan Voras, )
  Re: ZFS vs. UFS  (Craig James, )
   Re: ZFS vs. UFS  (Laszlo Nagy, )
    Re: ZFS vs. UFS  (Craig James, )
 Heavy inserts load wile querying...  (Ioannis Anagnostopoulos, )
  Re: Heavy inserts load wile querying...  (Craig James, )
   Re: Heavy inserts load wile querying...  (Ioannis Anagnostopoulos, )
 Re: ZFS vs. UFS  (Torsten Zuehlsdorff, )
  Re: ZFS vs. UFS  (Laszlo Nagy, )
   Re: ZFS vs. UFS  (Torsten Zuehlsdorff, )
 Re: ZFS vs. UFS  (Greg Smith, )
  Re: ZFS vs. UFS  (Laszlo Nagy, )
   Re: ZFS vs. UFS  (Craig James, ) 
Hi.

As far as I know UFS is faster than ZFS on FreeBSD 9.0.

Some users reported stability problem with ZFS on AMD64 and maybe UFS is
better choice.

Best regards
Georgi

On 07/24/2012 03:51 PM, Laszlo Nagy wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Under FreeBSD 9, what filesystem should I use for PostgreSQL? (Dell
> PowerEdge 2900, 24G mem, 10x2T SATA2 disk, Intel RAID controller.)
>
>     * ZFS is journaled, and it is more independent of the hardware. So
>       if the computer goes wrong, I can move the zfs array to a
>       different server.
>     * UFS is not journaled. Also I have to rely on the RAID card to
>       build the RAID array. If there is a hw problem with it, then I
>       won't be able to recover the data easily.
>
> I wonder if UFS has better performance or not. Or can you suggest
> another fs? Just of the PGDATA directory.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Laszlo
>

В списке pgsql-performance по дате сообщения:

Предыдущее:
От: Claudio Freire
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Linux memory zone reclaim
Следующее:
От: Craig James
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ZFS vs. UFS