On 07/20/2012 01:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of vie jul 20 13:15:12 -0400 2012:
>> On 07/19/2012 09:54 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, I would like to remove the prepared_transactions test from
>>> the main isolation schedule, and add a new Make target which runs that
>>> test explicitly. Is there any objection to that?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Here's the patch for that.
> Looks reasonable. I'd like to have an "include" directive in regress
> files so that we don't have to repeat the whole set in the second file,
> but please don't let that wishlist item to stop you from committing this
> patch.
>
> Are you planning to have one of your animals run the prepared xacts
> schedule? :-)
>
Possibly - I'm tossing up in my mind the best way to do that. (Hacking
the script on a particular client would be the wrong way.)
cheers
andrew