Re: 2GB limit for temp_file_limit on 32bit platform
От
Mark Kirkwood
Тема
Re: 2GB limit for temp_file_limit on 32bit platform
Дата
Msg-id
5008C20F.3010506@catalyst.net.nz
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
2GB limit for temp_file_limit on 32bit platform Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: 2GB limit for temp_file_limit on 32bit platform Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: 2GB limit for temp_file_limit on 32bit platform Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
Re: 2GB limit for temp_file_limit on 32bit platform Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: 2GB limit for temp_file_limit on 32bit platform Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: 2GB limit for temp_file_limit on 32bit platform "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: 2GB limit for temp_file_limit on 32bit platform Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com>
Re: 2GB limit for temp_file_limit on 32bit platform "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: 2GB limit for temp_file_limit on 32bit platform Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
Re: 2GB limit for temp_file_limit on 32bit platform Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
On 20/07/12 12:02, Tom Lane wrote:
> Pavel Stehule writes:
>> I did a backport of temp_file_limit feature to 9.1, but when we tested
>> this patch, we found very restristrictive limit to 2GB.
>> 2GB is nonsense, because this is session limit of temp files, and
>> these files should be longer than 2GB.
> This claim is nonsense. The variable's value is measured in KB, so the
> effective limit is actually 2TB not 2GB.
>
>
Did you guys perchance pick up one of the earlier patches that had
MAX_KILOBYTES instead of INT_MAX as the limit? i.e:
{"temp_file_limit", PGC_SUSET, RESOURCES_DISK, gettext_noop("Limits the total size of all temp files used
by each session."), gettext_noop("-1 means no limit."), GUC_UNIT_KB }, &temp_file_limit, -1, -1, **MAX_KILOBYTES**, <==== NULL, NULL, NULL },
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления