Proper use of select() parameter nfds?
От | Matthew Hagerty |
---|---|
Тема | Proper use of select() parameter nfds? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5.0.2.1.2.20010706010404.023309b0@pop.voyager.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Proper use of select() parameter nfds?
Re: Proper use of select() parameter nfds? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings, I am going over the use of select() for a server I'm writing and I *thought* I understood the man page's description for the use of the first parameter, nfds. From MAN: The first nfds descriptors are checked in each set; i.e., the descriptors from 0 through nfds-1 in the descriptor sets are examined. I take this to mean that each descriptor set contains n descriptors and I am interested in examining the first nfds descriptors referenced in my sets. I also understood it to mean that nfds has absolutely nothing to do with the actual *value* of a descriptor, i.e. the value returned by fopen(), socket(), etc.. Is this correct thinking? What got me second-guessing myself was a use of select() that seems to indicate that you have to make sure nfds is larger than the value of the largest descriptor you want checked. Here is the select() from the questionable code (I can provide the whole function if necessary, it's not very big): if (select(conn->sock + 1, &input_mask, &output_mask, &except_mask, (struct timeval *) NULL) < 0) Is this improper use? conn->sock is set like this: /* Open a socket */ if ((conn->sock = socket(family, SOCK_STREAM, 0)) < 0) Any clarification on how nfds should be set would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Matthew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: