Re: Plain strdup() in frontend code

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Daniel Gustafsson
Тема Re: Plain strdup() in frontend code
Дата
Msg-id 4fge7Kzv5SzWhkPBTB9wlN6Xpi95hr_u7HBDxwT2JiNNMg6ersKPlFz3qyqwFTmSzGm90BGy9hj4BVc2mWI-WFvJvI38CxrOAdKIk2zdApM=@yesql.se
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Plain strdup() in frontend code  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: Plain strdup() in frontend code  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Monday, April 29, 2019 3:01 PM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:47:27AM +0000, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> > Reading code I noticed that we in a few rare instances use strdup() in frontend
> > utilities instead of pg_strdup(). Is there a reason for not using pg_strdup()
> > consistently as per the attached patch?
>
> I think that it is good practice to encourage its use, so making
> things more consistent is a good idea. While on it, we could also
> switch psql's do_lo_import() which uses a malloc() to
> pg_malloc_extended() with MCXT_ALLOC_NO_OOM. GetPrivilegesToDelete()
> in pg_ctl also has an instance of malloc() with a similar failure
> mode.

Good point, I've updated the patch to include those as well.


cheers ./daniel



Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Anastasia Lubennikova
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Failure in contrib test _int on loach
Следующее
От: Daniel Gustafsson
Дата:
Сообщение: Typofixes in src/bin