-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
Tom Lane wrote:
> Actually, long threads tend to run into that restriction on all the
> lists --- it's the References: lines that get long. If we're going to
> increase the limit (which I agree with) please do it across the board
> not just for -hackers.
I don't have the power to do it across the board, but I bet Marc does.
Greg Stark wrote:
> I think we shouldn't raise it to 10240 rather than just 2048.
> I mean, what are we afraid of with long headers, that the mail
> servers will run out of memory on a 1k header?
s/shouldn't/should/ I presume.
I'm sure there's a relevant RFC somewhere about the lengths, but it's
kind of a moot point. In all my years of moderating (and I've been at
this longer than anyone except Marc at this point, I think), I've
never seen a header long enough to warrant 10240.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201006171348
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAkwaYBwACgkQvJuQZxSWSsiz7gCgmRZ9Wuig0YE3p4+84aw4brhd
fGwAoJj392QTXQ6WKollxcuzA3XsfrLM
=GYLI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----