Re:Re: PANIC :Call AbortTransaction when transaction id is nonormal

At 2019-05-14 07:53:36, "Michael Paquier" <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 09:37:32AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> But ... that code's been like that for decades and nobody's complained
>> before.  Why are we worried about bootstrap's response to signals at all?
>
>Yeah, I don't think that it is something worth bothering either.  As
>you mentioned the data folder would be removed by default.  Or perhaps
>the reporter has another case in mind which could justify a change in
>the signal handlers?  I am ready to hear that case, but there is
>nothing about the reason why it could be a benefit.
>
>The patch proposed upthread is not something I find correct anyway,
>I'd rather have the abort path complain loudly about a bootstrap
>transaction that fails instead of just ignoring it, because it is the
>kind of transaction which must never fail.  And it seems to me that it
>can be handy for development purposes.
>--
>Michael