El 18/05/16 a las 09:56, Vik Fearing escribió:
> On 18/05/16 14:51, Justin Clift wrote:
>> On 18 May 2016, at 05:35, Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net> wrote:
>>> Following up...
>>>
>>> It appears from today's PgCon meeting that the majority of core developers agree with my simplified proposal, just
havingMAJOR.PATCH version numbers, and that the plan is to implement that, pending packager/etc feedback.
>>>
>>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2016_Developer_Meeting#Poll_on_Version_Numbering
>>
>> Looking at the entry there in the wiki, it says:
>>
>> "Simon called for a vote on whether the next release will be 10.0. There was
>> already consensus that the next release is 10.0."
>>
>> For clarity, does that mean this release coming soon is 10.0, or the release
>> after that - sometime in 2017(?) - is 10.0? :)
>
> 9.6 will be 9.6, the next version will be 10.0 (instead of 9.7).
I think that 9.7 will be 10, and not 10.0.
Moving to major.minor versioning.
Regards,
--
Martín Marqués http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services