Hi,
On 9/1/22 3:28 AM, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:05:55 -0500, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote in
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 12:03:06PM -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
>>> Hi Hackers,
>>>
>>> Attached is a patch to
>>> Add tracking of backend memory allocated
Thanks for the patch.
+ 1 on the idea.
>>> + proargmodes => '{i,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o}',
>> In the past, there was concern about making pg_stat_activity wider by
>> adding information that's less-essential than what's been there for
>> years. This is only an int64, so it's not "wide", but I wonder if
>> there's another way to expose this information? Like adding backends to
> The view looks already too wide to me. I don't want the numbers for
> metrics are added to the view.
+1 for a dedicated view.
While we are at it, what do you think about also recording the max
memory allocated by a backend? (could be useful and would avoid sampling
for which there is no guarantee to sample the max anyway).
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com