On 2022/07/22 17:31, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> I believed that it is recommended to move to the style not having the
> outmost parens. That style has been introduced by e3a87b4991.
I read the commit log, but I'm not sure yet if it's really recommended to remove extra parens even from the existing
callsto errmsg(). Removing extra parens can interfere with back-patching of the changes around those errmsg(), can't
it?
Anyway, at first I pushed the 0001 patch that removes useless arguments in ReadCheckpointRecord().
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION