Re: BUG: Former primary node might stuck when started as a standby

04.03.2026 10:23, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Did you find any buildfarm failures involving 028?  I cannot get
> excited in changing tests where nothing has happened, and this test
> looks OK as we don't do a switchover.  For 004, we have at least one
> failure recorded based on what you said.  That's a fact sufficient for
> me to fix things, for 004.

No, I didn't. I agree that eliminating already known failures makes more
sense. Anyway, we'll have the thread which explain why such failures can
happen.

Best regards,
Alexander