Re: Transaction question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Ross
Тема Re: Transaction question
Дата
Msg-id 4FFE07FB.1050807@wykids.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Transaction question  (Marcin Mańk <marcin.mank@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On 7/11/12 4:24 PM, Marcin Mańk wrote:


On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Jeff Ross <jross@wykids.org> wrote:
 
2012-06-19 15:37:36.283752500 <www%wykids> LOG:  statement: update survey_response set srv_resp_submitted = now() where srv_resp_srv_id = 2 and srv_resp_pp_id = 25399

jross@wykids localhost# select * from survey_response where srv_resp_submitted is not null and srv_resp_srv_id = 2 and srv_resp_pp_id not in (select srv_answers_pp_id from survey_answers where srv_answers_srv_id = 2);
 srv_resp_id | srv_resp_srv_id | srv_resp_pp_id | srv_resp_invite       |    srv_resp_first_look     | srv_resp_submitted
-------------+-----------------+----------------+----------------------------+----------------------------+----------------------------
        5674 |               2 |          25399 | 2012-06-19 15:12:49.589233 | 2012-06-19 15:33:05.547012 | 2012-06-19 15:38:16.724393


The timestamps don't match - something updated the record after 15:37:36  . 
Also, are the fields like srv_answers_srv_id character fields? The inserts are quoting them like varchars, which seems odd.

Greetings
Marcin
!DSPAM:4ffdfd2b110892010192983!
Yes, that was a copy / paste error that I tried to fix rather than re-do.  I explained that up thread.

I just posted the table definition but they are integer fields.  As far as the quoting of integer fields, that is the way Pear DB does inserts.  What's the harm?

Jeff


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Ross
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Transaction question
Следующее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Transaction question