2012-06-29 15:01 keltezéssel, Andres Freund írta:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday, June 29, 2012 02:43:52 PM Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>> trying to review this one according to
>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch
>>
>> # Is the patch in context diff format
>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diff#Context_format>?
>> No. (Does this requirement still apply after PostgreSQL switched to GIT?)
> Many people seem to send patches in unified format and just some days ago Tom
> said it doesn't matter to him. I still can't properly read context diffs, so I
> am using unified...
Unified diffs are usually more readable for me after following
the Linux kernel development for years and are shorter than
context diffs.
>> # Does it apply cleanly to the current git master?
>> No. The patches 01...09 in this series taken from the mailing list apply
>> cleanly, 10 and 11 fail with rejects.
> Yea, and even the patches before that need to be rebased, at least partially
> they won't compile even though they apply cleanly.
>
> I will produce a rebased version soon, but then we haven't fully aggreed on
> preliminary patches to this one, so there doesn't seem to be too much point in
> reviewing this one before the other stuff is clear.
>
> Marking the patch as "Returned with Feedback" for now. I have done the same
> with 13, 15. Those seem to be too much in limbo for CF-style reviews.
>
> Thanks!
You're welcome.
> Andres
--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de http://www.postgresql.at/