Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Posix Shared Mem patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4FEA3596.3060501@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Posix Shared Mem patch ("A.M." <agentm@themactionfaction.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> This can be trivially reproduced if one runs an old (SysV shared memory-based) postgresql alongside a potentially newerpostgresql with a smaller SysV segment. This can occur with applications that bundle postgresql as part of the app. I'm not saying it doesn't happen at all. I'm saying it's not the 80% case. So let's fix the 80% case with something we feel confident in, and then revisit the no-sysv interlock as a separate patch. That way if we can't fix the interlock issues, we still have a reduced-shmem version of Postgres. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: