Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node
| От | Heikki Linnakangas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4FE18D86.7030602@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a
'origin' node
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 20.06.2012 11:34, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 20 June 2012 16:23, Heikki Linnakangas > <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> It's only needed for multi-master replication, where the same table can be >> updated from multiple nodes. Just leave that out for now. There's plenty of >> functionality and issues left even without that. > > Huh? Multi-master replication is what is being built here and many > people want that. Sure, but presumably you're going to implement master-slave first, and build multi-master on top of that. What I'm saying is that we can leave out the origin-id for now, since we don't have agreement on it, and revisit it after master-slave replication is working. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: