Re: Backport of fsync queue compaction

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Smith
Тема Re: Backport of fsync queue compaction
Дата
Msg-id 4FE14C38.6030704@2ndQuadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Backport of fsync queue compaction  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 06/19/2012 08:41 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Josh Berkus<josh@agliodbs.com>  wrote:
>> To what version will we backport it?
>
> All supported branches, I would think.

Yeah, I would feel a lot better if this was improved in 8.3 and up.  I 
didn't bother trying to push it before now because I wanted both more 
bad examples and some miles on 9.1 without the new code triggering any 
problems from the field.  Seems we're at that point now.

I fear a lot of people are going to stay on 8.3 for a long time even 
after it's officially unsupported.  It's been hard enough to move some 
people off of 8.1 and 8.2 even with the carrot of "8.3 will be much 
faster at everything".  I fear 8.3 is going to end up like 7.4, where a 
7 year long support window passes and people are still using it years later.

-- 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@2ndQuadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Allow WAL information to recover corrupted pg_controldata
Следующее
От: Josh Kupershmidt
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: return values of backend sub-main functions