Re: Verifying a timestamp is null or in the past
| От | David Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Verifying a timestamp is null or in the past |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4FDF1D7F-9DE8-4D2F-A191-B0C0499CE82B@yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Verifying a timestamp is null or in the past (Ondrej Ivanič <ondrej.ivanic@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Verifying a timestamp is null or in the past
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Hi,
On 2 January 2012 03:26, Raymond O'Donnell <rod@iol.ie> wrote:And also - does PERFORM works with FOUND?Not sure what you mean - can you elaborate?
No, perform (and execute) doesn't populate 'found' variable:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/plpgsql-statements.html#PLPGSQL-STATEMENTS-DIAGNOSTICS
You have to use something like this:
get diagnostics rr = row_count;
--
Ondrej Ivanic
(ondrej.ivanic@gmail.com)
From the documentation you just linked to....
A PERFORM statement sets FOUND true if it produces (and discards) one or more rows, false if no row is produced.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: