On 06/10/2012 03:20 AM, Mark Thornton wrote:
> 4. 3980922 rows, 1167MB, 276s
> 5. 31843368 rows, 9709MB, ~ 10 hours
Just judging based on the difference between these two, it would appear
to be from a lot of temp space thrashing. An order of magnitude more
rows shouldn't take over 100x longer to cluster, even with GIST. What's
your maintenance_work_mem setting?
--
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 500 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-444-8534
sthomas@optionshouse.com
______________________________________________
See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email