Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Euler Taveira
Тема Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea
Дата
Msg-id 4FC28670.5050805@timbira.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea  (Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 27-05-2012 10:45, Fujii Masao wrote:
> OK, let me propose another approach: add pg_size_pretty(int).
> If we do this, all usability and performance problems will be solved.
>
I wouldn't like to add another function but if it solves both problems... +1.


--   Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira       http://www.timbira.com.br/  PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento,
Suporte24x7 e Treinamento
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Backends stalled in 'startup' state: index corruption
Следующее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug in new buffering GiST build code