Re: Latch-ifying the syslogger process

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: Latch-ifying the syslogger process
Дата
Msg-id 4FAEC161.6070002@dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Latch-ifying the syslogger process  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Latch-ifying the syslogger process  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers

On 05/12/2012 03:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I noticed a large oversight in our efforts to reduce the server's idle
> wakeup frequency: if you've got logging_collector turned on, the
> syslogger process will wake up once a second, whether it has anything
> to do or not.  But the only reasons it has for waking up are signals,
> data arrival, and time-based logfile rotation, and it is easy to
> calculate the time until the next logfile rotation event.  So this
> seems really easy to latch-ify, and I would like to apply the attached
> patch if there are not objections.  I do not however have the ability
> to test the Windows side of it, so it'd be nice if someone would check
> that that still works (particularly, that it shuts down cleanly).


I can do that. I'm doing some Windows investigation ATM so this won't be 
hard to add on to it.

It's worth pointing out that the buildfarm client doesn't currently test 
the syslogger at all. It probably should, at least optionally. That 
wouldn't be too hard to arrange. A SMOP :-)

cheers

andrew




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Latch-ifying the syslogger process
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: libpq URL syntax vs SQLAlchemy