On 07.05.2012 13:54, Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> On 07.05.2012 13:39, Dave Page wrote:
>>> Can you create a "PRE-9_2" branch for the current architecture, and
>>> apply Ashesh's patch to that if you think it's a reasonable fix
>>> please? We can then move the older builds to that branch. Then the 9.2
>>> changes can go on master.
>>
>> By current architecture, do you mean what we had in the CVS, or as the code
>> stands in the current tip of the git repository? I agree we should create a
>> branch like that, but I want to make sure we agree on where it should be
>> branched off. I've rearranged and cleaned up the code quite extensively in
>> git master already, and I'm not sure if we want to include all that in
>> back-branches. On one hand, I've fixed a lot of bugs with the changes, so it
>> would be nice to include those fixes, but OTOH, perhaps we shouldn't risk
>> destabilizing back-branches.
>
> What's at the current tip. I'm happy with those changes in the back
> branches - they're really mostly just bug fixes and relatively minor
> architectural tweaks as I understood them. It's the move to a single
> library that I don't want in the back branches.
Ok. I created branch PRE_9_2, and committed Ashesh's patch there. In
master, I committed a patch to merge pldbgapi.so and plugin_debugger.so.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com