Re: Unexpected sequence scan

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin Grittner
Тема Re: Unexpected sequence scan
Дата
Msg-id 4FA3A410020000250004787C@gw.wicourts.gov
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Unexpected sequence scan  (Dan Fairs <dan.fairs@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Dan Fairs <dan.fairs@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have a query which is running slowly, and the query plan shows
> an unexpected sequence scan where I'd have expected the planner to
> use an index.

Looking at the actual row counts compared to run time, it appears
that the active portion of your data set is heavily cached.  In such
an environment, I would add these lines to postgresql.conf, to
better model costs:

seq_page_cost = 0.1
random_page_cost = 0.1  # or maybe slightly higher
cpu_tuple_cost = 0.03

-Kevin

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dan Fairs
Дата:
Сообщение: Unexpected sequence scan
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Unexpected sequence scan