Re: Uniform UPDATE queries

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Rob Sargent
Тема Re: Uniform UPDATE queries
Дата
Msg-id 4F905A2F.7080205@gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Uniform UPDATE queries  (Dennis <dennis.verbeek@victorem.com>)
Список pgsql-sql
On 04/19/2012 04:55 AM, Dennis wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
> The example you have given is EXACTLY why something like CURRENT is
> needed to limit the number of unique queries or prepared statements. (or
> to do a selection of all values before an update meaning two executed
> queries.)
>
> regards,.
>
> Dennis
>
> On 04/18/2012 06:24 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Dennis<dennis.verbeek@victorem.com> writes:
>>> When a query is written to update a table, the usual process is to
>>> list all the columns that need
>>> updating. This could imply the creation of many possible queries for
>>> many columns. In an effort to
>>> keep the UPDATE queries more uniform, less number of unique queries,
>>> a keyword similar to DEFAULT,
>>> let's say CURRENT, is required to indicate that the current value
>>> must not change.
>> No it isn't. Just write the name of the column, eg
>>
>> update mytable set x = x, y =<new value>, z = z where ...
>>
>> There's no reason to invent nonstandard syntax for this.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>>
>>
>
>


Not if you have all the old and new values:


update mytable set x= xval, y=yval, z=zval where yval happens to be a 
new value and xval, zval are current.

Seems your callers knows which have changed. Does it not know which have 
not (and what their values are)?


В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dennis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Uniform UPDATE queries
Следующее
От: John Fabiani
Дата:
Сообщение: getting the OS user name