Re: bad planning with 75% effective_cache_size

On 4/17/12 2:49 AM, Istvan Endredy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the suggestion, but it didn't help. We have tried it earlier.
>
> 7500ms
> http://explain.depesz.com/s/ctn

This plan seems very odd -- doing individual index lookups on 2.8m rows
is not standard planner behavior.  Can you confirm that all of your
other query cost parameters are the defaults?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com