Re: JSON for PG 9.2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Дата
Msg-id 4F8C2859.6050203@dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: JSON for PG 9.2  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@krosing.net>)
Ответы Re: JSON for PG 9.2  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Re: JSON for PG 9.2  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers

On 04/16/2012 09:34 AM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>> based on Abhijit's feeling and some discussion offline, the consensus
>> seems to be to remove query_to_json.
> The only comment I have here is that query_to_json could have been
> replaced with json_agg, so thet you don't need to do double-buffering
> for the results of array(<yourquery>) call in
>
> SELECT array_to_json(array(<yourquery>));
>
> Or is there some other way to avoid it except to wrap row_to_json()
> calls in own aggregate function which adds enclosing brackets and comma
> separator ( like this : '['<row1>[,<rowN>]']' ?
>
>

The way I usually write this is:
    select array_to_json(array_agg(q))    from (<yourquery>) q;

It's a pity you didn't make this comment back in January when we were 
talking about this. I think it's too late now in this release cycle to 
be talking about adding the aggregate function.

cheers

andrew


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Hannu Krosing
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: index-only scans vs. Hot Standby, round two